Sometimes Jerry texts me and says, “I’ve been writing!”
That’s his way of saying, “let’s get to work”. Jerry thinks I loose motivation
at times. Maybe I do. I stopped by his apartment the other day to pick up his
notes and chat a little. He was bouncing off the walls because he was just
awarded his “section 8 housing”. This means he’ll have most of his rent paid
for by the government. “Life’s going to get a little easier,” he beamed. It
should also be noted that Jerry is dealing with a recent diagnosis: type 2
diabetes. He’s not complaining though.
He wrote more about the shock of entering prison for the
first time way back in his late teens or early 20s. Jerry was describing how different it was
back then. He wasn’t sure, but he thinks the politics in prison changed in the
mid to late 90s. Jerry had fears like
any normal young inmate. In the 80s and early 90s Jerry’s fear was mainly
centered on being confused for someone else. Jerry says he had one of those
faces. Guys swearing they knew him from somewhere frequently approached him. He
dreaded those times. He absolutely did not want to be confused with an inmate
that had an “unacceptable” crime in their record. I asked Jerry to explain. “Is
there honor among thieves?” I asked. He didn’t hear or he ignored me. Very
seriously, Jerry started to enlighten me as to which crimes could get you
killed in prison. Of course any crime involving a child (sexual or otherwise)
was punishable by violent assault. As previously mentioned when stabbing,
lungs, hearts and main arteries were not avoided to spare lives. If someone
“fell out” (as Jerry puts it), it was to be (as they say). Rape was on the same
level—not tolerated. All the Domestic violent charges had to be assessed as to
the circumstances. But for the most part, they received an inmate assault and
they were made to leave. I asked Jerry how and by what authority could an
inmate be made to leave—and where would they go? Jerry explained that an
“unacceptable charge” on an inmate’s record would require him to immediately
request to be transferred to a different yard or go into protective custody. It
was called “having dirt” on your record. In a different yard, an inmate would
take his chances in attempting to conceal his record. It would never work. Most
of the time they would have to enter into protective custody. If they refused
to request to be transferred, it meant an additional deadly assault. And the
assaults would keep coming if they survived.
So prior to the late 90s switch in inmate vetting, guys survived
by reputation, or literally provided proof that they had an honorable criminal
record. It wasn’t uncommon that a child molester or rapist could exist in the
general population if they handled them self properly. This type of inmate
could blend in by being accepted as a typical druggie or neighborhood gangster.
Basically if one did not give a reason to be investigated by his fellow
inmates, he could survive. This changed though. He couldn’t remember the exact
year but Jerry knew it was before 2000. With the onset of the Internet and the
prison population reaching epic numbers, every inmate was now being required to
provide proof of their acceptable record—their “paperwork”. The Internet made
it easy for friends on the outside to get information. Court documents were
easily accessible to the public. Not to mention the availability of Internet
background checks. This proof was to be presented to the race
representative—every race had a representative that tracked these matters.
Another reason that paperwork was required for every inmate was the number of
mistaken identity assaults. As
previously mentioned, this was Jerry’s ultimate fear—being confused for a
rapist or child molester. Jerry
graciously welcomed the thorough inmate vetting. “It was starting to get to a
point where inmates were guilty until they could prove their innocence.” “There
were plenty of assaults and that resulted in deaths that shouldn’t have
happened.” “Guys were dying and it could have been anyone”. Jerry told me of a time he was waiting in
line for his lunch at Folsom. The line was long and he could see the line
splitting down the middle. Everyone was moving slowly, making their way to the
sneeze guarded chow. As he got closer, he realized everyone was stepping over
and around a dead inmate swimming in a pool of blood. His throat had been cut
from ear to ear. He was dead. The C.O.s ran in just as Jerry got close. He
learned later it was a case of mistaken identity. He was believed by some to be
a sex offender and that was good enough. “There were a lot of us that knew that
dude had no dirt on his record”. “We were looking at each other like FUCK who’s
next?” “I did not want to go out like that”.
In the county system, a lot of inmates were still going to court or
awaiting a sentence. If in inmate asked another inmate for paper work, he could
legitimately claim that it didn’t exist yet. But prior criminal records
did. For the most part, there was a
grace period before you were beaten and stabbed. Jerry speculated that by 2005,
every inmate knew that he must produce his paperwork by the time he reached his
final destination to serve his sentence. In Jerry’s case, after he left the
county jail, he would arrive at Chino’s reception center then enter in west
yard. He could stay there for up to 6 weeks. Then he would go to someplace like
Mule Creek prison or Folsom. It was there he would serve the rest of his
sentence. It would be absolutely unacceptable for an inmate to reach his final
sentence prison with out paper work. There was no excuse. Jerry was remembering some times where his
prison associates were interviewing a recent arrival. He remembered this inmate
believed he was a respectable prison convict. After being pressed, this inmate
produced as much paperwork on his criminal career that he could dig up. The
inmate approval team (I call them) scoured the documents and discovered a
“masturbation in public” conviction that occurred over 15 years prior. The vetting team approached the guy and gave
him a fair offer. They told him to immediately approach a Correctional Officer
(C.O.) and beg to be transferred because his life was in danger. He was to ask
or, risk a deadly assault and then still be asked to leave. Jerry remembers 2
guys in this situation. One guy decided to stand his ground because he felt it
would help his reputation as someone who wouldn’t back down. This didn’t work
out for him so well. He went into protective custody (P.C.) after his stay in
the infirmary. The other guy went straight to a C.O. and told him an “exposing
case” was discovered on his record and he had to go P.C as soon as possible. An “exposing” case meant he was previously
arrested and charged with exposing his penis in public—an unacceptable charge
in prison. I asked Jerry how C.D.C.R was
able to act out of the inmate’s safety so fast. Jerry explained that the inmate
that wasn’t necessarily transferred on the spot. He could just be held in his
cell until a transfer was feasible. Usually they would wait for a few days in
their safe cell. If they came out for anything, it could mean their life.